The overall aim of this paper is to provide a general setting for
quantitative quality measures of Knowledge-Based System behavior which
is widely applicable to many Knowledge- Based Systems. We propose a
general approach that we call degradation studiesof how system output
changes as a function of degrading system input, such as incomplete or
incorrect data or knowledge.
To show the feasibility of our approach, we have applied it in a case
study. We have taken a large and realistic vegetation-classification
system, and have analyzed its behavior under various varieties of
incomplete and incorrect input. This case study shows that degradation
studies can reveal interesting and surprising properties of the system
under study.
@Article{KAIS03,
author = "Perry Groot and Annette ten Teije and Frank van Harmelen",
title = "A quantitative analysis of the robustness of
Knowledge-Based Systems through degradation studies",
journal = "Knowledge and Information Systems",
year = 2003,
volume = 7,
number = 2,
pages = "224-245",
URL = "http://www.springerlink.com/app/home/contribution.asp?wasp=8cac231awn5ynvebaddj&referrer=parent&backto=issue,5,6;journal,2,25;linkingpublicationresults,1:105441,1",
keywords = {Approximate Reasoning},
urlPaper = "http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/postscript/KAIS03.pdf"
}
Back to list of papers