We argue that diagnosis should not be seen as solving a problem with a unique definition, but rather that there exists a whole space of reasonable notions of diagnosis. These notions can be seen as mutual approximations. We present a number of reasons for choosing among different notions of diagnosis. We also present an exhaustive categorisation of techniques that can be employed to obtain approximations, as well as a number of specific example techniques for each category. We also show that it is possible to characterise the relations between the approximations obtained by these techniques.
@InProceedings{SARA95,
author = "F. van Harmelen and A. ten Teije",
title = "Approximations in diagnosis: motivations and techniques",
editor = "",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Symposium on Abstraction, Reformulation
and Approximation, (\uc{SARA}'95)",
year = 1995,
address = "Ville d'Esterl, Canada",
month = "August",
keywords = {Approximate Reasoning, Diagnostic Reasoning},
urlPaper = "http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/postscript/SARA95.pdf"
}
Back to list of papers